योगसूत्रYoga SūtrasOpen in the app

III. Vibhūti Pāda · Saṃyama (3.1–3.8)

3.3 · Only the Flame

A single golden lamp flame burning in deep violet darkness inside a small stone sanctum. The brass lamp beneath it is lost in shadow, so that only the flame seems to exist, steady and clear, its glow just touching the stone.
तदेवार्थमात्रनिर्भासं स्वरूपशून्यमिव समाधिः ॥ ३.३ ॥
tad evārthamātranirbhāsaṃ svarūpaśūnyam iva samādhiḥ

Absorption is that same meditation when only the object shines, as if empty of its own form.

Word by word

tad
that
eva
same
artha-mātra-nirbhāsam
shining as the object alone
sva-rūpa-śūnyam
empty of its own form
iva
as if
samādhiḥ
absorption

Where it fits

The third inner limb completes the series. Absorption is 'that same' meditation of 3.2, now so given to its object that it seems empty of itself. The wording repeats 1.43, so this is the coalescence of pāda 1 reached through the limbs. 3.4 names the three together.

Reading

Absorption is the same meditation carried further. Only the object shines, and the one meditating seems to vanish into it. Patañjali says 'as if' empty of its own form: the act of meditating drops out of view and only the object appears. Vyāsa says the meditation enters into the nature of its object. One way to read this today: anyone lost in music or in good work has touched the edge of it. The wording repeats 1.43, where coalescence is described the same way.

Vyāsa

“When meditation shines forth only in the form of its object, and becomes as if empty of its own nature as a thought, because it has entered into the nature of the object, it is called absorption.”

Vyāsa's Yoga-bhāṣya, the oldest commentary. New translation from the Sanskrit, with reference to Woods (1914), p. 204–205.

Practice

Choose something simple and absorbing: listening to one piece of music, watching water, drawing a leaf. Give it ten minutes. Afterwards, recall the moments when you forgot yourself. What was left when the sense of 'I am doing this' dropped away?

A question to sit with

When did you last forget yourself in what you were attending to?

Where commentators disagree

What marks the shift from contemplation (dhyāna) to absorption (samādhi), and is samādhi a 'trance'?

Vyāsa
When contemplation shines forth as the object alone and is, as it were, empty of its own form as an idea, entering into the nature of the object, it is called absorption. (Woods 1914, pp. 204–205)
Vācaspati Miśra
'As it were' answers the objection that if it were empty the object could not appear. What drops away is the distinction (kalpanā) between the contemplating and the thing contemplated; he cites the Viṣṇu Purāṇa for this. (Woods 1914, p. 205)
Bhoja
When only the one object is lit up and the thought seems to lose its own identity, that is samādhi; the word means that which brings the mind together, setting it on one point by avoiding all distractions. (Tatya 1885, pp. 95–96; Mitra 1883, wisdomlib on 3.3)
Rajendralala Mitra
In samādhi even the distinction between thinker and thought is lost. 'Trance' or 'catalepsy' is a poor English word for it, since it notes only the stopping of bodily functions, while samādhi stresses the intensity of thinking. (Mitra 1883, note on 3.3 (wisdomlib))

Key ideas

samādhi (absorption), saṃyama (holding together), samāpatti (coalescence)